river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John McClain <John.McCl...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Responsibilities of the PPMC
Date Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:40:24 GMT
I think "reasonably high bar for commit to ensure working social and 
technical compatibility, and then faster PMC" is a reasonable place to 
start (understanding that it may well be imposable to change once we 
start....)

I think "initial committer list == initial PPMC" is fine too.

Jim Hurley wrote:
> I am +1 for this position/proposal.  Can others on the list
> please state your opinion (I think this will be a healthy
> activity for us).
> 
> Geir - I am assuming that we're going to make
> initial committer list == initial PPMC, though.  Cool
> with that?
> 
> thanks -Jim
> 
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> My personal taste lately is a reasonably high bar for commit to 
>>>> ensure working social and technical compatibility, and then faster PMC.
>>>
>>> Given the nature of the ASF and the high quality and consistency of the
>>> codebase brought in I'm inclined to go for you personal taste.
>>>
>>> In theory it might be possible to come up with a completely different
>>> process that would be a better fit, but for me it will be a waste of
>>> time to start thinking of that and why not try something that has proven
>>> itself on a few occasions.
>>
>> But note that the bar isn't really that high overall - to me it's more 
>> about social compatibility than technical prowess, because someone who 
>> understands their limits, works well with others, and is willing to 
>> learn is a treasure :)
>>
>> geir
>>
>>> --Mark
> 


Mime
View raw message