river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Hurley <Jim.Hur...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Responsibilities of the PPMC
Date Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:03:30 GMT
I am +1 for this position/proposal.  Can others on the list
please state your opinion (I think this will be a healthy
activity for us).

Geir - I am assuming that we're going to make
initial committer list == initial PPMC, though.  Cool
with that?

thanks -Jim

On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> My personal taste lately is a reasonably high bar for commit to  
>>> ensure working social and technical compatibility, and then  
>>> faster PMC.
>> Given the nature of the ASF and the high quality and consistency  
>> of the
>> codebase brought in I'm inclined to go for you personal taste.
>> In theory it might be possible to come up with a completely different
>> process that would be a better fit, but for me it will be a waste of
>> time to start thinking of that and why not try something that has  
>> proven
>> itself on a few occasions.
> But note that the bar isn't really that high overall - to me it's  
> more about social compatibility than technical prowess, because  
> someone who understands their limits, works well with others, and  
> is willing to learn is a treasure :)
> geir
>> -- 
>> Mark

View raw message