river-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com>
Subject Re: thoughts on River project organization...
Date Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:04:02 GMT
Hi Gregg:

	I'm with Bill on this one; also with Tor from JavaPosse.
http://blogs.sun.com/tor/entry/code_advice_3_no_tabs

Greg.

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 23:13, Bill Venners wrote:
> Hi Gregg,
> 
> You realize of course this means war. I'm all for a style standard,  
> so long as it is 4 *spaces* for each level of indentation.
> 
> Actually, I usually have no problem adapting to whatever the style is  
> of the project I'm working on, but at home, at Artima, we use four  
> spaces to indent Java.
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:43 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> 
> > Jim Hurley wrote:
> >> If ya'll think this (organization) is a good idea -- I'd
> >> like to agree on the initial list, where to put it, and
> >> how best to attack it. Let me know what you think.
> >
> > One issue that I'd like to bring up, but which may create a lot of  
> > disagreement is the whitespace usage in the JTSK sources.  I'd  
> > like, at some point, for all lines of code to have leading tabs  
> > only.  Everyone seems to like different whitespace/columns for  
> > indentation and tabs only seems to provide the most flexability.   
> > It means that diffs have to be generated with -b, or in some way  
> > which removes whitespace from consideration for any updates people  
> > submit between the old code and their current code.
> >
> > Am I just retentive about this issue, or does anyone else have some  
> > problems poping the source up in an editor/ide with something  
> > besides 8 char tabs?
> >
> > Gregg Wonderly
> >
> 


Mime
View raw message