river-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sijs...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1033194 - /incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext
Date Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:17:31 GMT
Author: sijskes
Date: Tue Nov  9 20:17:31 2010
New Revision: 1033194

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1033194&view=rev
Log:
small fixups

Modified:
    incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext

Modified: incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext?rev=1033194&r1=1033193&r2=1033194&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext (original)
+++ incubator/river/site/trunk/content/user-guide-river-jar-artifacts.mdtext Tue Nov  9 20:17:31
2010
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Title: User Guide - River JAR Artifacts
 
-# Use Guide - River JAR Artifacts
+# User Guide - River JAR Artifacts
 
 
 The following is an extract from Brian Murphy's [post](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/201008.mbox/%3cAANLkTi=bfA5q-n_5f-ft1Pv+VKt2ZV2MUEbX2GN4+TTD@mail.gmail.com%3e)
on the developer mailing list highlight some of the history behind the River/Jini JAR artifacts.
 
-{quote}For those who might be wondering about artifacts like jini-core.jar, jini-ext.jar,
sun-util.jar, etc., although there have been previous postings discussing how they are no
longer needed, it might help some of the new folks on the list to hear a repeat of the history
of those artifacts; and why they should not be used, and why they should probably be removed
from the build.
+... For those who might be wondering about artifacts like jini-core.jar, jini-ext.jar, sun-util.jar,
etc., although there have been previous postings discussing how they are no longer needed,
it might help some of the new folks on the list to hear a repeat of the history of those artifacts;
and why they should not be used, and why they should probably be removed from the build.
 
 Back in the old jini 2.x release time frame, there was quite a bit of time and thought put
into how the distribution should be re-packaged to address deployment issues; for example,
better modularity, supporting overlays when upgrading, etc. That work resulted in the current
artifact structure we now see; jsk-platform/jsk-lib/jsk-resources/jsk-dl/<service>/<service>-dl.
 
 But because the team did not want to break existing deployments that relied on the old jar
structure, they decided to also include the old artifacts in the release; along with a detailed
release note explaining the new philosophy and encouraging folks to move to the new model,
and be prepared for the removal of those old jar files down the road. Unfortunately, due to
unforeseen events, the removal of the old unnecessary jar files never occurred, and people
seem to still be using them (at least, based on postings on the various user lists out there).
-{quote}
\ No newline at end of file
+...
\ No newline at end of file



Mime
View raw message