reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sergiy Matusevych <sergiy.matusev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: gRPC based Java Bridge
Date Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:37:54 GMT
By the way, do we know if YARN is planning to migrate to a newer version of
protobuf? As far as I know, Hadoop 3.1 still uses protobuf 2.5 :(

Anyway, we can probably just shadow protobuf2.5 together with hadoop jars
and use newer protobuf for both gRPC and config serialization.

-- Sergiy.


On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We initially used protobuf but switched to avro because of its better
> .Net support.
> > Thus, we have both protobuf and avro.
>
> Yes, and the .NET support in protobuf got *significantly* better
> since. Version 3 and newer of protobuf, as well as current gRPC
> versions have 1st class support for .NET, while Avro really is still
> kinda bad.
>
> Markus
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message