reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Inglis <msing...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Protobuf.NET could be .NET Core compatible
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:09:13 GMT
I don't have access to one. If you don't mind, that would be great, but at
some point I could use the experience to walk through running on a Yarn
cluster.

Here is my branch:
https://github.com/apache/reef/compare/master...singlis:REEF-1830

Thank you!


On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Rogan Carr <rogan.carr@gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, thanks for doing this! It was at the top of my list :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Rogan Carr <rogan.carr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott,
> >
> > Can you please try HelloREEF and the IMRU.Examples on a Yarn cluster?
> >
> > If you don't have access, I have one I could run your build on.
> >
> > Best,
> > Rogan
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Scott Inglis <msinglft@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello --
> >>
> >> I'm volunteering for this.
> >>
> >> It does look like 2.1.0 will work as it has binaries for 451 as well as
> >> netstandard 1.3 and 1.5. I have updated the REEF projects with this
> >> library
> >> and have run the tests locally -- all pass. I'm running a mvn clean just
> >> to
> >> be sure.
> >>
> >> I will also try the 2nd suggestion of trying this version of the library
> >> in
> >> the dot net projects to confirm it works there as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> I will create a JIRA for updating to protobuf 2.1.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any additional testing that needs to be done?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Douglas Service <dsopsrc@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is great news.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Rogan and I just discovered that there has been a new release 2.1.0
> of
> >> > > Protobuf-net which claims compatibility with NetStandard 1.3 [0].
> This
> >> > > could be *fantastic* news for our port to Linux, as we could evade
> the
> >> > > whole "replace protobuf with avro" work for a little longer.
> >> > >
> >> > > To know whether this actually *is* fantastic, we need to do two
> >> things:
> >> > >
> >> > > (1) Update the current main build of REEF to use 2.1.0 and test it
> in
> >> > > YARN and locally. If it passes, we know that the update does not
> break
> >> > > us, and we can also update to version 2.1.0 for good.
> >> > >
> >> > > (2) Test that the 2.1.0 version is actually compatible with
> >> > > netstandard in one of our projects.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Both of these can proceed in parallel. Any volunteers for either
> one?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Markus
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > [0]: https://www.nuget.org/packages/protobuf-net/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message