reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Byung-Gon Chun <bgc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.16 release plan
Date Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:47:15 GMT
Thank you for all the efforts to make release 0.16 happen!

Taegeon, could you give us status update? Thanks.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for looking at .Net CI failures, Julia!
>
> Thanks for handling Java CI failures, Sergiy and Taegeon!
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Julia Wang (QIUHE) <
> Qiuhe.Wang@microsoft.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I am working on some of the .Net AppVeyor test failures now.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergiy Matusevych [mailto:sergiy.matusevych@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 5:12 PM
>> To: dev@reef.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 0.16 release plan
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Tae-Geon Um <taegeonum@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, never mind.
>> > I thought that we still need some time to make sure that Unmanaged AM
>> > works properly on Hadoop 2.7.3 :)
>> >
>>
>> Great, then we have only two items left! :-) I can confirm that Unmanaged
>> AM works on proper version of YARN; still, we need to address the Java
>> issues (that is, item #1) as they are related to the Unmanaged AM mode. For
>> example, we must make sure close all threads before exiting REEF Driver -
>> otherwise, HelloREEFYarnUnmanagedAM example can hang as it does not
>> currently have a System.exit() call at the end.
>>
>> Thanks for help!
>> Sergiy.
>>
>> > On Mar 16, 2017, at 6:07 AM, Sergiy Matusevych <
>> > sergiy.matusevych@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Taegeon,
>> > >
>> > > What exactly do you mean by #3? We have a HelloREEF example running
>> > > in Unmanaged AM mode (see HelloREEFYarnUnmanagedAM class), and it
>> > > works fine on YARN 2.7.3. We also have several examples and unit
>> > > tests that check
>> > the
>> > > Unmanaged AM and REEF-as-a-library functionality, e.g.
>> > > HelloREEFEnvironment, ReefOnReefDriver, REEFEnvironmentDriverTest,
>> > > and such. What else do you think we should unit test? (I am saying
>> > > that our unit tests are comprehensive (they are not!), but I would
>> > > love to know
>> > what
>> > > area you think we should focus on for 0.16 release)
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Sergiy.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Tae-Geon Um <taegeonum@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> It’s been about 10 months since we’ve released the latest version
>> > >> (0.15
>> > > version).
>> > >> In order not to delay the release any longer, I want to call a
>> > >> release
>> > > vote as soon as possible.
>> > >>
>> > >> Do you think it is ok for me to call a 0.16 release vote on next
>> > Thursday
>> > > (23th)?
>> > >> I know there still remain several blocking issues:
>> > >> 1) Java side CI failures
>> > >> 2) .NET side CI failures
>> > >> 3) Unmanaged AM test
>> > >>
>> > >> I want to know if it is possible that they can be resolved until
>> > >> next
>> > > Thursday.
>> > >> I’m currently taking a look at 1) (with Sergiy’s help), and the
due
>> > >> date
>> > > is ok to me.
>> > >> How about 2) and 3) ? As far as I know, 2) is on Julia and Sergiy
>> > >> is
>> > > working on 3).
>> > >> If the plan seems not ok, could you please share the ETA of them?
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Taegeon
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun
>



-- 
Byung-Gon Chun

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message