reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.16?
Date Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:07:40 GMT
Sergei,
I definitely have more experience with Java than .Net, maybe this is a JIRA that I also add
to my collection and help you, might be a good case for pair coding as well, let me know how
you want to move forward.
Thanks

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 6:23 PM, Sergiy Matusevych <sergiy.matusevych@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Saikat,
> 
> The cleanup work is purely Java, so if you are working on the .NET side of
> things, I don't see much sense to switch the environment just for these
> issues. Still, it would be nice to get some help - maybe there are
> volunteers willing to debug some race conditions in Java and on YARN?
> 
> Thank you,
> Sergiy.
> 
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1969@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Me and my big mouth :))))), just kidding, I am already working on .Net
>> core 2.0 conversion JIRA's , what sort of dev/test help can I provide?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Sergiy Matusevych <
>> sergiy.matusevych@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Saikat,
>>> 
>>> The failures are sporadic and most likely are due to some race conditions
>>> during the cleanup process. You don't need CI to replicate them, but we
>>> need to debug the issues not only in local mode, but also on YARN (and,
>>> ideally, for all other runtimes that we provide). A good indicator of
>>> successful cleanup would be JIRA issue
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/REEF-1715 - when all threads are
>>> closed properly, we would no longer need System.exit() call at the end of
>>> the Driver or Evaluator processes (regardless of the runtime). Would you
>> be
>>> interested in helping me with that part?
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Sergiy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1969@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Out of curiosity have we been able to replicate these failures locally ,
>>>> am wondering whether there's a need to have a local version of Travis ci
>>>> setup?
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Boris Shulman <shulmanb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is AM HA part of 0.16?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Sergiy Matusevych <
>>>> sergiy.matusevych@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Markus,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we can safely announce that Unmanaged AM and REEF-on-REEF
will
>>>> be
>>>>>> part of 0.16, but the bugs that Mariia mentions prevent us from
>> calling
>>>>>> this release REEF-as-a-Library. Even for the unmanaged AM, I need
some
>>>> time
>>>>>> (likely till the end of this sprint) to make sure that Unmanaged
AM
>>>> works
>>>>>> properly on Hadoop 2.7.3 and above.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Sergiy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Mariia Mykhailova <
>>>>>> mamykhai@microsoft.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are several transient test failures in both Java and .NET
tests
>>>> and
>>>>>>> Travis CI job timeout (which indicates hidden problems in terminating
>>>> Java
>>>>>>> REEF jobs) which we've introduced since 0.15. I don't think we
should
>>>> do a
>>>>>>> release with these issues uninvestigated, especially Travis timeout.
>>>> For
>>>>>>> now I've marked them as blocking REEF-1444.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Mariia
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 9:31:35 AM
>>>>>>> To: REEF Developers Mailinglist
>>>>>>> Subject: 0.16?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> where are we in the process of releasing 0.16? In other words:
If we
>>>> called
>>>>>>> the release today, what amazing feature that is on the cusp of
>> getting
>>>> in
>>>>>>> would we loose?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm not suggesting to literally do it today, but a release around
the
>>>> VS
>>>>>>> 2017 availability would be convenient for us to switch to the
new
>> build
>>>>>>> system and all early in the works towards 0.17.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Markus
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message