reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gyewon Lee <strayyy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: .Net Avro support union?
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2016 05:40:13 GMT
Okay. I will re-submit my PR w/o Avro serialization and make a separate
issue after it is merged. All configurations containing named objects will
be ignored during serialization processes.

Again, thank you so much!

Best,
Gyewon

2016-09-27 0:58 GMT+09:00 Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com>:

> Hi Gyewon,
>
> As far as REEF-31 w/o Avro serialization does not break the .NET side, I'm
> fine with the plan.
>
> -Gon
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Gyewon Lee <strayyyyyy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for your kind responses, Gon & Markus!
> >
> > I agree that REEF-31 should cohere with the current moving onto Protobuf
> > 3.x.
> >
> > The current REEF-31 commit has a change in Tang Avro Schema and it seems
> > that it causes a problem on .Net side. In this case, I think I can remove
> > Avro serialization part from REEF-31, and deal with serializations after
> > moving to Protobuf 3.x. has finished.
> >
> > How do you think about this plan?
> >
> > Best,
> > Gyewon
> >
> > 2016-09-26 15:18 GMT+09:00 Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de>:
> >
> > > On 2016-09-25 17:41, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> > >
> > >> We're in the process of replacing Avro with protobuf 3.x.
> > >> We may want to update REEF-31 to work with protobuf 3.x..
> > >>
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > However, we are in a bit of a limbo state until protobuf 3 has been
> added
> > > as a dependency. We might have to hold off on other protocol-related
> > > changes till that is done.
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message