Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7983C200B6B for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 05:06:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 73854160AB1; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B7B1D160AA4 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 05:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 16418 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2016 03:06:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 16406 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2016 03:06:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 25E631A03DA for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9tUxv--abHi for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com (mail-pf0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B9EBD5F3F5 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y134so21955255pfg.0 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:06:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rq6JuQHUkKZE1lrd/jFOAC5biOiQ0NjlpGr4ddkR7zM=; b=OGoA+2fUJdYT/42sArjxLlXSIvMduo4/Sv9VMyuXt3c4Zas5RIPH5ELZ5+zap7RJ0Z lIyEQTKfnJF86kZ6PwN1Fn+Dk01QxEa82ZPhCmRrVxT3+g/U1jNemwmiw5tDzFgkyGhn 6uXyLweDLXdRPLxzvs6Vb6mD9pngzmulKV/aC+VrLCtOrZZ7b3LthmLDP5WR0nT7eK8O CYwx2Swme1F98YCs/40nlvSnmacLmRgfvdK8ktYNxf+jPYPtJfo2rYbKvQR9RdKFrLKP 7E0dbnBtdyQQ/109Df4GMfooH1OUJPSLRFvn1BGdU0iCCl9NlYkb1DKXkIo7cLdbuhx1 h+GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rq6JuQHUkKZE1lrd/jFOAC5biOiQ0NjlpGr4ddkR7zM=; b=f3OuYl/BRZi+hXi56iplhDOOwN/nTua4coOOVrhwWmD7GlBflf9kwd77hHfvxt6erM +K9AhvIIir+Ykq5yBsHWybxLI3UTEwvbuCEwY149PzuuaAdJzTMJJn5XXg9//SLKDiOe k2+SoY7FVwxZ6k8qj+b2PhIlhWPMuT95uS6FkiUgiL2b4Sc/gGpQEK+4RE2GVj6yvBXK DeSgI+npDtYUCHka74xe/AbDItLQqZVrvxTdHnZ/OLdvPij2uTpF5+3cjsV/wye+85Su CeYPcGWKNcsIdY/YF3nYkuGTyFhtlAM++OKbZmS/eH/kqWurdyjATtxg9ZysJAJnIZhQ Be7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv49JvphoMJWe5Y/f1//lSZkpW+C59JNXIESJWe+fKq3S9xYWWb3j8uH4cLJ9DLDQ== X-Received: by 10.98.80.220 with SMTP id g89mr13034837pfj.12.1470884784072; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (50-46-115-146.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net. [50.46.115.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5sm516739pfg.0.2016.08.10.20.06.23 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Sequentiality of .NET driver-side events To: dev@reef.apache.org References: From: Markus Weimer Message-ID: <952d82de-36b7-dac4-186a-cbdb914578ec@weimo.de> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:06:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 03:06:35 -0000 On 2016-08-10 15:09, Jason Jeong wrote: > I would like to know if others agree on this, or if there is some > other intended behavior behind all the synchronization. IIRC, the main reason for this is ease of development of the .NET / Java bridge. > If we agree on fixing this issue, then I would like to work on this > myself, especially since I actually have a use case blocked by this > one ;) Thanks! Please make sure that you coordinate with the .NET on Linux thread, which might touch upon the same code base sometime this late summer. Markus