Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org
Subject: Re: Q about the runtime folder for the .NET tests
To: dev@reef.apache.org
References: <6adf86a7-e094-a10e-ca80-c34a3c656063@weimo.de>
 <57559937.6050600@weimo.de>
 <BN3PR03MB217938D088D94CDC0F2608DFD25C0@BN3PR03MB2179.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <e6070e16-a5fb-97d1-bb47-451b9b9f74c2@weimo.de>
 <BN3PR03MB217938055FD667E75DEE503AD25C0@BN3PR03MB2179.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <e62f8016-178d-afad-02dd-bbcbe9e25f61@weimo.de>
 <BN3PR03MB21791C04DCC3433EAB373A18D25C0@BN3PR03MB2179.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de>
Message-ID: <4d412941-0926-e51e-e7f5-eaaf0edecff6@weimo.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:26:52 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR03MB21791C04DCC3433EAB373A18D25C0@BN3PR03MB2179.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 17:27:00 -0000

On 2016-06-06 3:17 PM, Mariia Mykhailova wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to name the outer folders by the test
>> name?
> Folder name length? For tests with long names,
> REEF_LOCAL_RUNTIMEe6b76755 is shorter than
> EvaluatorRequestingDriverSpecifyingRuntimeName.

Yes, but we have `REEF_LOCAL_RUNTIMEe6b76755\[JOBNAME]` in the end. 
Which is quite long in its own right and can create issues with the 260 
char limit, depending on where the source code is checked out on a drive.

> We can consider using System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod()
> to get test name uniformly in all tests. Right now test names shown
> in folder names don't always equal to names of actual tests which
> create those folders.

The REEF local runtime already uses the job name to name the folder for 
the job. That should work, right?

Markus