Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF7C200B32 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 01:39:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8A730160A36; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:39:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D2D64160A35 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 01:39:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88209 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2016 23:39:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 88197 invoked by uid 99); 24 May 2016 23:39:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:39:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 43E67C0BBB for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:39:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iuwJQuFLkAVC for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 32AB05F471 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id tb2so11230508pac.2 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:38:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lgvgdUR3ae+KoBF1Ejp3ERuZLc4s2bCQ8zVkD/8bAaQ=; b=XMNO1QLCjXNeFpsHiD1WgIigMkJN34RBGJBuRWWIEz8h8zfDxF0dIbWhQlY0VSNMVW NW+R8ZDuFFXDOxuMXUEGwbjUjgqdjWtIaWS2gtwI+NbCaFTNCfwW9VUhJmimlHHE6jcS uCbpjWI86kZSnEbczwqrLF5PL1KBjQ2bNnmpdx4qnipE20Bi9QJzB2MXiIUndDibQSK1 toF45rsI6Q51vbjJ68AyfgHBVQcC9PwOTbdEz3f92nemL0PYu3id9RXGK8UHmpKvy4J2 niytZG/BBnUt1CxnQ6G1pWID+kL6YGUBr7y60dfLICXbK21Qw4UofcK1VzAru++B702W J/jA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lgvgdUR3ae+KoBF1Ejp3ERuZLc4s2bCQ8zVkD/8bAaQ=; b=cNntuio3AyG4C9U71sJCP3Fq/OMzT/HHD0mMP6299KhKUPde6bcz50YbjWp3BxJY6Q B/Hb84SFZUUIBZ0kHSq4hWa9PajVYwHu9Qh5fUYHNvH1fcU1YgZeV/1ZPg5JYUeQiUyt earI0miv/Y4c/3C/qLcZlZf9rrfueGuLVn1WOWGFQdc08OJhyzrFC1ZPY3EN/WZPGmlq zdFXhgLM3uz/6b12GLqctcw7WStC6Xx/KKIxBcuKlvluqytp2c+t7jESnhRzUFZfpu7M eObiA6mkf59h2luSqHlStmdL56tBRVbluGA4UiRDZmO6nPm9fnnFjpM7WpgtqtdzjqAs d6Og== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKcHigAHHDcougTdRjvcX3RugsC8rfhjH0Jb9dJ4PgB6It8lgs9KhsF+W876H4qhQ== X-Received: by 10.67.22.168 with SMTP id ht8mr1240442pad.50.1464132735454; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (50-46-112-139.evrt.wa.frontiernet.net. [50.46.112.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lq8sm7699827pab.40.2016.05.24.16.32.14 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.15.0 (rc2) To: dev@reef.apache.org References: <7E2163E5-C40E-4716-8514-801A699B41A4@gmail.com> <19A2FB4F-4D4C-4638-9BD9-A305561410ED@gmail.com> <7754D1DF-ADE2-407C-9922-F3DD9B780354@gmail.com> <0CCCE87D-B840-4DF4-AC8A-3F3214660EA2@gmail.com> From: Markus Weimer Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:32:18 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:39:03 -0000 On 2016-05-24 16:14, Mariia Mykhailova wrote: > My guess is the failure happens too early, before information about > context had time to propagate properly. Maybe we should delete > TestEvaluatorWithActiveContextImmediatePoison and keep the one with > delayed failure, which is more robust? No, I think the test is exposing an important edge case. In practice, we can't really control when an exception is thrown in application code, and it might just happen immediately after the context launches. I suspect this issue will go away or become easier to fix as part of REEF-1403, where we discuss better ways to lock state in the Evaluator. Markus