Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2C52009C6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 00:41:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BBCCC160A1F; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DEAC160A19 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 00:41:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 22757 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2016 22:41:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 22686 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2016 22:41:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 88C921A068F for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pharPmf7pjIk for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com (mail-yw0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 732C35F29C for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x189so25721430ywe.3 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:41:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=YeAN2ZhXxqK3iaHHPiAxc0JKRgDrhViHkVpnaaWMSpw=; b=Fc9iHLDU+i7EOgpHWrs1JvW5xhTQqucFEWfnEQJ6f1ZOyZ08d9Q4gPJIl/57oPJ/Hf ECXX9F3rNc1ggv1aSu9lKMn846mFO2WdRe61UGBCru7lRGWh8X3onqwu8QCk9gtooA4b Vroed3UmA1IfARbyp4Ta0hFiKJXsbfDKYPzTMmD3O7um5qjYVbqVGMzIWnyYnkyihy3s 4Tdv7eUIYOTQQG9Lc0WcnK40kBhO5j1l4NeXEULP84sUNAb+bPUluuUsziWFK98LVq7y xpzOgQLCmoKeUkGpLPLj7jzoYTHdEcGc5bWxJJUaWY650KUbfW54RUG718WHhaxpZmST Mrdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=YeAN2ZhXxqK3iaHHPiAxc0JKRgDrhViHkVpnaaWMSpw=; b=m+IAVNRGTtGOXHL9+b4Mron8SNqBSW6ugrLeOpjdYFM8sEg/NLudG9WAoROiZbslFL w+HUCz85UOtNdCJoEcSYNKsntapUW9psC8MZKra8cgwJkd6cxjSAlPdzyw9O+ToEKBw5 /6DAdnfWIigUYSa3NLQn83Ce6lNh59LyiposoPGb1Yuowjnhy0R5LzhwDPPvW2DyqBGG /XBPjMuNtRsJfHRZF3qgPqNUnfIgyxiMqFGa6DLedRBvgmnNN10ckTX8BKT+wmJckXBS /vzSK5cc/J5axXOwsSedtm+wLVgQUCj0CHNSLWRk8goON0iLKvAVbhlwkAzzUSFCWVNo a9YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUbDIS9sY1rgD4FQozqlBgG74iykOYzRBTSfUdwSoLqegSHTXnwGzJRLY4vB2+Q7wmL80qUyeGVqVoqBA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.105.194 with SMTP id e185mr15604135ywc.64.1463438469649; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.212.145 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 15:41:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:41:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Error messages in reef functional tests From: Dhruv Mahajan To: dev@reef.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11490b2c225b240532fd52f7 archived-at: Mon, 16 May 2016 22:41:14 -0000 --001a11490b2c225b240532fd52f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Also I cloned reef at some other location on my machine and re-ran tests. Got the same errors in tests. This rules out cleaning issues. Dhruv On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Chung wrote: > I've gotten the test logs from Dhruv, and judging from what I see in the > logs prior to looking into the code, what is happening seems like the > following: > > 1. Evaluator fails. > 2. FailedEvaluatorHandler gets called. > 3. We send request for another Evaluator in FailedEvaluatorHandler. > 4. Before the EvaluatorRequestor sends the request, the Driver idleness > handler kicks in and detects that the Driver is idle, i.e. no active > Evaluators and no outstanding requests. > 5. Driver is declared as idle and shut down. > 6. EvaluatorRequestor processes requests. Evaluator starts as Driver is > shutting down. > 7. Test failure. > > I'll take a closer look at the code and provide updates. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Dhruv Mahajan > wrote: > > > Did deep cleaning and ran tests from command line...Still getting one > > error. Also got the error window. > > > > > > > Org.Apache.REEF.Tests.Functional.Bridge.TestUnhandledTaskException.TestUnhandledTaskExceptionCrashesEvaluator > > > > Expected number of evaluators to fail (2) differs from actual number > > of failed evaluator indicators (1)\r\nExpected: True\r\nActual: > > False > > > > at > > > Org.Apache.REEF.Tests.Functional.ReefFunctionalTest.ValidateSuccessForLocalRuntime(Int32 > > numberOfContextsToClose, Int32 numberOfTasksToFail, Int32 > > numberOfEvaluatorsToFail, String testFolder) in > > > > > c:\Users\dhrumaha\Desktop\projects\reef\lang\cs\Org.Apache.REEF.Tests\Functional\ReefFunctionalTest.cs:line > > 169 > > at > > > Org.Apache.REEF.Tests.Functional.Bridge.TestUnhandledTaskException.TestUnhandledTaskExceptionCrashesEvaluator() > > in > > > c:\Users\dhrumaha\Desktop\projects\reef\lang\cs\Org.Apache.REEF.Tests\Functional\Bridge\TestUnhandledTaskException.cs:line > > 54 > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Dhruv Mahajan > > wrote: > > > > > Command line ... Lemme do deep clean once again. > > > > > > Dhruv > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Markus Weimer > wrote: > > > > > >> Are you running from the command line or Visual Studio? The tests pass > > all > > >> the time from the command line for me, and AppVeyor now reports the > same > > >> ... > > >> > > >> Markus > > >> > > > > > > > > > --001a11490b2c225b240532fd52f7--