Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77B9200AED for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 22:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D629E1609F4; Tue, 3 May 2016 22:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 28B561609A9 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 22:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 5750 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2016 20:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 5738 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2016 20:39:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:39:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 36055C9E90 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:39:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbIZ5FrZA51x for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 755B15F476 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id j74so39276983ywg.1 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:39:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=yYgcDeuyj9CcOPjpE7lgcRoTOaNh71cPlLfwDNklaOc=; b=uYeOl1vmsjSGKHUbknhivLxHLbGH0jGaaACfyz9HdeUBU0/mdwZB8UkAC0Ca/OdV6U +r5bIkWhnCbPG5ihRu9wBnwWSNobSGocwxHg+pox8w4MYAIWaRRMDFFvRAqFxoDQpsT3 6SvOHJRaqAy2ezcfzwGI6gl6SNyAt3YRZOQ57BfUlBXknys86pN940vL2uDd9RbMOZuX ruw0hq9ZgfAKh2QxRdWVPptWyzXXfkgUSmt48hg6LmxFiq8jvuY3S/EQ+4IK+MINWPTJ Pflj191PaA2I8y15I+lSHkvk7ojKe3Pj63XBw8aR3HGuolrJys8XqdAnKHZOnK8EZ6jA LRGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=yYgcDeuyj9CcOPjpE7lgcRoTOaNh71cPlLfwDNklaOc=; b=NjIvamSeRajrmHU3v4HMEV0GYTR/X4t9nZlz499Vr2AGALX6c1cw/VtOgPheKRizN8 uVTGHgtoz7RjvueYQtiRld6AIQsxoJQiCmgIJkrU+1ZRLvomWh4I4KVStY2CizsP3ktc GFMCVj2MSiNyp3DzbjRqd+qgNGbWCwawGk7VoYnyLLZuJuypS5LtvDcGHmYFkNcU8AmZ VjORFeDHrtVj8PZ6bRqqw4EMancO4ATHXvj9QA+7gY4sx0l/XeINv5plA4YnbVI5OoDf Fm0dRVV2Hbs2f+DZ4UVH4NIYYgnuQf/SkDOPOrWegnJ+rmZ7BuE4wKOcDyqpvM/LDA+V dAnA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXVIEgCEnGf7U00X84VIUumMGKSAvRF+geK4hHRSDC8gr+Fjf0PxgyaTkEYz0/Kv9K+uhoJAU7nzkGx6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.163.210 with SMTP id a201mr2797536ywh.242.1462307947480; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.129.93.138 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <96c28164-8bc8-2165-25a5-ee9792d265e1@weimo.de> Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:39:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: REEF 0.15 From: Boris Shulman To: dev@reef.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1284dcc311cd0531f619d0 archived-at: Tue, 03 May 2016 20:39:13 -0000 --94eb2c1284dcc311cd0531f619d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can we finalize what is required for 0.15 and what can be moved to future releases? I prefer having this discussion here. Boris. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Boris Shulman wrote: > I don't think REEF-1230 should block > the release. > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Markus Weimer wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the release JIRA [REEF-1215] mentions a bunch more, some of which we >> habitually move from release to release. Ironically, the ones you mentioned >> weren't even on that list. I fixed that :) >> >> Let's figure out what to do with all these blockers, either here or on >> the JIRA. >> >> Markus >> >> >> >> On 5/2/2016 1:21 AM, Boris Shulman wrote: >> >>> As REEF-1054 will take more time then anticipated I suggest to cur REEF >>> 0.15 rigth after the following JIRAs will be in: >>> 1) REEF-1354 - that allows >>> using >>> multiruntime from c# by implementing the c# client side (without official >>> support in REEF .NET) >>> 2) REEF-1375 - that fixes >>> Java >>> multi runtime in 0.15 >>> 3) REEF-1243 >>> >>> Do we have any other JIRAs that are a must for 0.15 besides these? >>> >>> @Dhruv, did we have any progress on REEF-1243? >>> >>> Boris. >>> >>> > --94eb2c1284dcc311cd0531f619d0--