Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C1200AC8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:05:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B391B160A24; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 05353160A0E for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:05:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 47226 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2016 22:05:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 47213 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2016 22:05:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6905DC03BC for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IwSnZ7SqgP1O for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EB38E5F59E for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id qo8so66733212pab.1 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=weimo-de.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qR112aH6mVEv0QdIOguSFdJS3PkgfHX6KyBdccpvnZ4=; b=gVU+UNj55n+BdbahVn/2oguoENjF1nqhQUMwzyPY8WbTKH9hlYs9cJCBPQkyUokiXy SnGfJ963eif1gkGhkUyQM6OGQia9S2/vMew5x+UooZ4Dn6+ZlO5iWAFqaR98My56vDDK SyihFuelzuiyBSYCstiNiKkw8akZoMPQLivJ4QxkchFafjusSrtw4T5jPRD9Xbw8bzhD zbA9d6mFm63GyciJQJIibxKnMXqzO/Oki1Ju9s+DBbE12UwmgybzYtypW6zQI0lHz9cM j1k5WsSx/Frb+h1Y/gYYIY2mkm06LuTmhhLC+z158dWxx5/TZOzWYBeBw7KoNuRdv3ED Yamw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qR112aH6mVEv0QdIOguSFdJS3PkgfHX6KyBdccpvnZ4=; b=AF++v0bH+WC4eGSIJqsTTgHPz+nHzGPN7AFPqeH8+T1vNMHDTXG3ku4YO8EDa1q3Wv 9t7VhB4JSApnLVEaL3QmLWjjYjGOPi1qv6301gSmEfym3JG3pgtuvKTSkSEIgZgRDSKO 61C3/4VJo/AZZKxMN1dhDOckZFXEOzL0PH76oraF+3PQSQW6BrVtLbEU3OtSxFDtpQD1 U4SL6OVntpKN1MENwFrD7jfmB5LAJGqXxuLqp9TumObdCBrBHd5+tCKgkZLShMPgMnfX Y++jfIR7Ryk3ofy9bFnOGm/ikLh2fqoooRFyJlcRVMWflA+01Wzp30eJcqtCP+zqi31z PbVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKn3nRc0A6nRQlL0VaAU1b2w7ZjPS0hsfJMdm6akxaEUpsJGyjfAAEB+mJ7iiVzEQ== X-Received: by 10.66.100.197 with SMTP id fa5mr1595848pab.25.1464041097179; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4898:f0:52:f460:2eae:37d5:dfe? ([2001:4898:80e8:5::4fe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e184sm48928446pfe.14.2016.05.23.15.04.56 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 May 2016 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Hierarchical configuration modules To: dev@reef.apache.org References: From: Markus Weimer Message-ID: <9b964492-71b8-4091-cf4b-96f4fbd27fcc@weimo.de> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:04:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:05:07 -0000 On 2016-05-23 2:53 PM, Dhruv Mahajan wrote: > What is the ideal way to specify these chained/hierarchical > configuration modules? That is one of the more challenging issues with Tang. We don't have a good story for `ConfigurationModule` composition :-( Markus