Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-reef-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-reef-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BAAC19D2C for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73607 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-reef-dev-archive@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 73573 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@reef.apache.org Received: (qmail 73557 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2016 19:55:43 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:55:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BBC67C1322 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:55:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zi4wgQO3BigC for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (mail-yw0-f176.google.com [209.85.161.176]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 387E45F282 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t10so30205419ywa.0 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=9SykpnNeGO7d+ksmLwrVMH1Yx+K7OeG07FBo6FVCKq8=; b=dIgiG3Y4wyX/70GObMvnuZB8W7PPUvWL5vsSJVl2vYM+8O7KWlBVS28nX/DyhcdP7N ja0DijONSW5oSQuhrh/RQg9qvzQe50JxnZOsMT5sL1Z/Vpo+Fmlq0dCY7Qp5zRfIPNik PR+sPfMYoGrPlwGcJ4FGAudkbIArLepNCaC0aYN5d40GVEkNXk0dBWw/EjTujb+xUY3H 8/3vRbmcLeUk16IZ9vNRyhK+PSr8Ci7voFa+cPfIKTDZPixaLtjWmDKIfsWssQYnb9N6 kDgZ8BbRH7neQNmP/qJz4gzTCtPSuuAfoaYTsYYGh0Mu2QSzfPeixwvq/v3z7wMpbGY7 GbSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=9SykpnNeGO7d+ksmLwrVMH1Yx+K7OeG07FBo6FVCKq8=; b=ESDPn1ZpV1Td408XrPdZamJlzrwaI7wxKmzqtdJcJsnfiryZDvaRGXatJ0+9OYOGIo ihQvs6pLTr8fj5cfRwxIHMv2INRhkY+tPxEAW5ttYV4fUOg0jf9U2ceo60oy2UtseM2y EhTTzC5zcFV29KdBjEOMPkNyDo+9I6QuHWmjN+/JwBF43OSN9UkrVZBYwA7FBpldqz1V kkuu6uyQ+94koNljJx0yLKLmIInclzM1vlz56yY9Ru4TNN1ZGsol1kDKiAXnzogzjMdM 0/w1UIon0RwTroXduYpBF8BC0R3CJX4tXK0EkDq1eP38NdfRin78UeUyDsNrMM3YfhYG rLkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVcrvSY2vNtVbms4qFUCktB5NtmkV+muo+eQj5DYV+J1ZauZ0IHDHc9s+fxpx1fOVBfHvhCMCrqDRFffw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.124.87 with SMTP id x84mr3224918ywc.209.1461095734155; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.103.135 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:55:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:55:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issue with EvaluatorRequestor wrt. number of cores From: Dhruv Mahajan To: dev@reef.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114942cc37a1f10530dbdc24 --001a114942cc37a1f10530dbdc24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Can somebody please comment on this? Dhruv On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Dhruv Mahajan wrote: > Hi > In IMRU I was trying to allocate evaluators with 2 cores each. I verified > that request consisted of 2 core evaluators in C#. On checking java stderr > logs, I found the following:- > > INFO: allocated evaluator - serialized evaluator descriptor: IP=CISL-SLAVE-103.sys-sqlsvr.local/10.200.144.38, Port=45454, HostName=CISL-SLAVE-103.sys-sqlsvr.local, Memory=6144, Core=1, RuntimeName=Yarn > > > So it seems that I got 1 core evaluators only. Is this a bug? > > Dhruv > --001a114942cc37a1f10530dbdc24--