reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Julia Wang (QIUHE)" <Qiuhe.W...@microsoft.com>
Subject RE: Reef 0.15
Date Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:43:01 GMT
How long does the REEF-1054 will take? If it still needs a couple of days, I just feel we shouldn't
block the progress of fault tolerant. I know our CR can easily last for a week long :)

We don't have big changes on IMRU yet. Whatever we do so far are about REEF fixes, scenario
tests, and utilities like Poison, state machine, those are really not substantial  changes
for fault tolerant yet. 

What is your concern Markus? 

Thanks,
Julia

-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Shulman [mailto:shulmanb@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 2:31 PM
To: dev@reef.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reef 0.15

Markus had some concerns regarding this.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Julia Wang (QIUHE) < Qiuhe.Wang@microsoft.com> wrote:

> We don't need to put IMRU fault tolerant work in 0.15 as we are still 
> working on it. But if you are not going to cut off immediately, it 
> also doesn't matter if we check in any related changes. This is because:
>
> 1. Whatever changes we check in will still make the system work. This 
> is the same as any other changes.
> 2. IMRU change essentially doesn't impact other clients
>
> Thank,
> Julia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dhruv Mahajan [mailto:dhruv.mahajan@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:01 AM
> To: dev@reef.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reef 0.15
>
> Guys give me today and either I will post something related to the issue.
> Regarding IMRU, the current FT work will take some time worst case 
> proabably close to a month with everything tested and reaching a 
> stable case. So might be ok going without it. Julia please confirm the 
> time estimate.
>
> Dhruv
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Mariia Mykhailova < 
> mamykhai@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We have a history of tests which passed consistently on dev machines 
> > and failed only in Travis which turned out to be actual bugs in our 
> > code, for example, REEF-1040.
> >
> > -Mariia
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anupam [mailto:anupam128@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:48 AM
> > To: dev@reef.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Reef 0.15
> >
> > 0
> > That tests passes consistently on every developers' machine. An 
> > AppVeyor issue is more likely than test issue. Or could be port/ip 
> > address selection/firewall issue. The test was as is in 0.14. 
> > Doesn't seem like the right decision to delay release.
> >
> > On 20 April 2016 at 10:44, Boris Shulman <shulmanb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dhruv,
> > >
> > > Do you have any estimates for this task? I am trying to plan my 
> > > timelines with 0.15 (both release and the work that we will need 
> > > to do to integrate it).
> > >
> > > Boris.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 2016-04-20 10:12, Boris Shulman wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Is anyone working on tho issue?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Dhruv has it assigned.
> > >>
> > >> Markus
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anupam
> > Bellevue, WA
> > Ph: +1 (425)-777-5570
> >
>
Mime
View raw message