Mailing-List: contact dev-help@reef.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@reef.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56E88FBE.9000207@weimo.de>
References: <56E88EEB.7040305@weimo.de>
	<56E88FBE.9000207@weimo.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:52:34 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CADq0cj607EhQLcQHdE90eZak9tRGi8G79o574j8jao_8sxy=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Documentation commits without code review
From: Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com>
To: dev@reef.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11415a78cce941052e1e4054

--001a11415a78cce941052e1e4054
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de> wrote:

> +1
>
> (and fixed the subject :-) )
>
> Markus
>
> On 2016-03-15 15:38, Markus Weimer wrote:
> > Based on our recent discussion, I'd like to call the following vote:
> >
> > Allow [Documentation] commits: These are commits that only change
> > non-code files (README, website, ...). For these, the JIRA and Pull
> > Request process shall be optional.
> >
> > Instead, it is up to the committer to make a call whether consensus can
> > be assumed or a formal review period should be observed. If no review
> > has taken place, such commits must have commit messages starting with
> > `[Documentation]` instead of the JIRA id.
> >
> > This vote will be open for 48 hours
> >
> > [] +1 Allow [Documentation] commits without JIRA and review
> > [] +0 no opinion
> > [] -1 Do not allow [Documentation] commits because ...
> >
> > Markus
> >
>


-- 
Byung-Gon Chun

--001a11415a78cce941052e1e4054--