reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anupam <anupam...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Documentation commits without code review
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:21:42 GMT
+1

I thought this should have been subsumed by the [MINOR] tag we agreed on.

On 15 March 2016 at 15:52, Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> (and fixed the subject :-) )
>>
>> Markus
>>
>> On 2016-03-15 15:38, Markus Weimer wrote:
>> > Based on our recent discussion, I'd like to call the following vote:
>> >
>> > Allow [Documentation] commits: These are commits that only change
>> > non-code files (README, website, ...). For these, the JIRA and Pull
>> > Request process shall be optional.
>> >
>> > Instead, it is up to the committer to make a call whether consensus can
>> > be assumed or a formal review period should be observed. If no review
>> > has taken place, such commits must have commit messages starting with
>> > `[Documentation]` instead of the JIRA id.
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for 48 hours
>> >
>> > [] +1 Allow [Documentation] commits without JIRA and review
>> > [] +0 no opinion
>> > [] -1 Do not allow [Documentation] commits because ...
>> >
>> > Markus
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Byung-Gon Chun



-- 
Anupam
Bellevue, WA
Ph: +1 (425)-777-5570

Mime
View raw message