reef-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Documentation commits without code review
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:27:24 GMT
+0

I think PR should be a minimum requirement since I make mistakes sometime
and I like to be reviewed. :)
However, if the community want, I have no objection.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Anupam <anupam128@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> I thought this should have been subsumed by the [MINOR] tag we agreed on.
>
> On 15 March 2016 at 15:52, Byung-Gon Chun <bgchun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Markus Weimer <markus@weimo.de> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> (and fixed the subject :-) )
> >>
> >> Markus
> >>
> >> On 2016-03-15 15:38, Markus Weimer wrote:
> >> > Based on our recent discussion, I'd like to call the following vote:
> >> >
> >> > Allow [Documentation] commits: These are commits that only change
> >> > non-code files (README, website, ...). For these, the JIRA and Pull
> >> > Request process shall be optional.
> >> >
> >> > Instead, it is up to the committer to make a call whether consensus
> can
> >> > be assumed or a formal review period should be observed. If no review
> >> > has taken place, such commits must have commit messages starting with
> >> > `[Documentation]` instead of the JIRA id.
> >> >
> >> > This vote will be open for 48 hours
> >> >
> >> > [] +1 Allow [Documentation] commits without JIRA and review
> >> > [] +0 no opinion
> >> > [] -1 Do not allow [Documentation] commits because ...
> >> >
> >> > Markus
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Byung-Gon Chun
>
>
>
> --
> Anupam
> Bellevue, WA
> Ph: +1 (425)-777-5570
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message