quickstep-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harshad Deshmukh <hars...@cs.wisc.edu>
Subject Re: We really need to get going with the podling report
Date Thu, 02 Mar 2017 19:04:22 GMT
Hi Roman,

Apologies for the delay. I am not sure how to address two of these 
questions, hence left them blank. Any inputs in that regard should be 
helpful. Can you please review the following report?

*   Your project name
Apache (incubating) Quickstep

*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
     the project or necessarily of its field
Apache Quickstep is high-performance database engine designed to exploit the full potential
of hardware that is packed in modern computing boxes (servers and laptops).
The initial version targets single-node in-memory environments.

*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
     towards graduation.
1) Building a Quickstep community
2) More adoption of the Quickstep technology
3) Making the technology easier to understand and use

*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
     aware of

*   How has the community developed since the last report

*   How has the project developed since the last report.

We will have our first release this week. Since the last report,

1) We have made several changes to the code base.
Some highlights are: Cleaning up the third party library code as per the Apache hygiene, improve
the code performance by adding several novel features.

2) Preparation for release -
Created scripts and step by step procedural documentation for how to make a Quickstep release.
Scripts have been added to the main repo while documentation is on confluence.
We went through several release candidates. During this period, we identified some usability
issues on our supported platforms and fixed them. Quickstep is now on schedule for a release
later this week.

*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.

On 02/28/2017 10:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Bueller? Bueller? Bueller?


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message