Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44C9200BE2 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:15:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B2F4D160B15; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 122EA160B13 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:15:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 18712 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2016 17:15:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@quickstep.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18701 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2016 17:15:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7DDBD180B08 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYEt1_2TUHN1 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout2.cs.wisc.edu (smtpout.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.6.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BA1065F54F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [128.105.14.48] (shuffle.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.14.48]) by flint.cs.wisc.edu (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uBFHFjtb028373 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:15:45 -0600 Reply-To: harshad@cs.wisc.edu Subject: Re: Working towards a release References: <926B72DB-E1DF-47B0-A4AE-FEA039B9081A@gmail.com> <72BFF401-51CE-471C-8B0B-7450D70BE5CF@gmail.com> To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org From: Harshad Deshmukh Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:15:45 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <72BFF401-51CE-471C-8B0B-7450D70BE5CF@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------95350CBA4FF1590715BE65CE" archived-at: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:15:58 -0000 --------------95350CBA4FF1590715BE65CE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Jignesh, I can volunteer for the release manager role. On 12/10/2016 05:54 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Fellow Quickstep-pers: AFAIK we are good on all the items under 3.X in the release guidelines at: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html > > > > Next step, Section 1.1. We need a list of release managers. The reasons for signing a release are listed at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#motivation, and summarized as: “… users can make sure that what they received has not been modified in any way …“ > > > > We need to create a file that contains “… the public key signatures of the release managers (and optionally other committers) for the project …” > > > > I’m tossing my had in to be part of this group of release managers. Any objections? > > > > Anyone else wants to join the list of release managers? The more the merrier, and some groups have many of the active committers sign. > > > > Cheers, > > Jignesh > > > > On 12/4/16, 9:46 AM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: > > > > I know that Julian mentioned writing some blog posts. I'd like to write > > one. Maybe we could distill the recent paper, or talk about a specific > > component? Or just talk about all the recent improvements which got our > > performance way up before the paper. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Jignesh Patel > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Harshad for volunteering! > > > > > > Re. 3.5, I think the generated files are ok. > > > > > > We can sync up after you come back. Happy Travels. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jignesh > > > > > > On 12/3/16, 7:25 AM, "Harshad Deshmukh" wrote: > > > > > > A question on 3.5 - We have preprocessed parser and lexer files in the > > > parser module. Should we remove them? > > -- Thanks, Harshad --------------95350CBA4FF1590715BE65CE--