Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35100200BA3 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 00:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 33953160AEA; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 795FA160ADE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 00:12:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 86279 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2016 22:12:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@quickstep.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 86268 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2016 22:12:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 22:12:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0A3A1C0C99 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.019 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.019 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EvjeKTlgTZu for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id E52DB5F54E for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86238 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2016 22:12:29 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 22:12:29 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 050E1E056F; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) From: cramja To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] incubator-quickstep issue #109: Refactored SplitRowStore bulk insertion Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20161005221229.050E1E056F@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 22:12:29 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 22:12:35 -0000 Github user cramja commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/pull/109 @hbdeshmukh 2x improvement was for the contrived test of trying to insert a whole bunch of tuples into a Splitrow at once as in PR100. As for TPCH, I'm not sure, other than that this is not any slower. I could run those tests again, but right now I'm working on the compiler issue. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---