Mailing-List: contact dev-help@quickstep.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?
From: Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <FCF1EAC2-65CB-4AA5-8FDB-922AE899D2CD@pivotal.io>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:37:35 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5648F7EB-0AE6-4C13-A27E-543F4B005DFC@apache.org>
References: <CA+ULb+u66G=x3Hp+o4GHUHbqd2Zu7JiSOSoLASCe6Yr5EF2HtA@mail.gmail.com> <9F966CBE-6DCE-48D7-A6D8-250A8DC5E1AE@pivotal.io> <CAGdrNbd2C1fVj2SnDxnj0EN85JZmULTer=5Y4Ov8HaWNTaPtRw@mail.gmail.com> <612FE082-2CD4-4869-992E-1D7895F2B553@apache.org> <D434B8C8-01BB-4B72-9D9E-A726EB41DF9B@pivotal.io> <B6CCDA1F-1AB2-4394-8C0B-FB4B4E511B41@apache.org> <FCF1EAC2-65CB-4AA5-8FDB-922AE899D2CD@pivotal.io>
To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org
archived-at: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:37:52 -0000

OK, you should log an INFRA request to get Travis set up. It shouldn=E2=80=
=99t take more than a day or two but definitely nothing will happen =
until you log an INFRA request. Ask the Geode folks what they had to do =
to set up Travis.

Julian


> On May 10, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Jignesh Patel <jipatel@pivotal.io> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Julian: The current workflow is to have the PRs go through Travis =
to make the job of the reviewer far easier. This is what is missing and =
slows closing PRs.=20
>=20
> Cheers,
> Jignesh=20
>=20
>> On May 10, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> It=E2=80=99s a question of priority. Let=E2=80=99s not let the low =
priority stuff block the important stuff. Moving source control is =
urgent. I haven=E2=80=99t yet heard a reason why CI should delay moving =
source control.
>>=20
>>> On May 10, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Jignesh Patel <jipatel@pivotal.io> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Dear Julian,
>>>=20
>>> You do make a good point, but we have a very heavy reliance on the =
CI and it will certainly help the transition.=20
>>>=20
>>> Since other Apache projects do have a Travis CI, Zuyu has reached =
out to Roman to see if we can set this up.=20
>>>=20
>>> Agreed about the points that both you and Roman are making =E2=80=94 =
we do need to move fully to ASF soon. Thanks for your patience.=20
>>>=20
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jignesh=20
>>>=20
>>>> On May 9, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>> On May 8, 2016, at 8:39 PM, Zuyu Zhang <zzhang@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Yes, we need fix QUICKSTEP-2 before transiting to ASF.
>>>>=20
>>>> I disagree. It is much more important that you use ASF =
infrastructure for source control than for CI, and the one does not =
block the other.
>>>>=20
>>>> At Calcite it took a long time before we had CI running on ASF =
infrastructure. We continued to use Travis-CI, which we=E2=80=99d used =
before ASF.
>>>>=20
>>>> As Roman says, it is important for IP hygiene that commits are made =
directly to ASF git, and the sooner you switch over the better. I think =
you can do that before you transition CI.
>>>>=20
>>>> Julian
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20