Mailing-List: contact python-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4507433B.6020907@ukf.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:31:07 +0100
From: Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net>
Reply-To: python-dev@httpd.apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Thunderbird/1.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Graham Dumpleton <grahamd@dscpl.com.au>
CC: Jim Gallacher <jpg@jgassociates.ca>,  python-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: The mod_python wiki has materialized!
References: <45073890.5020407@jgassociates.ca>
 <E93AF6C6-0493-48EB-AE83-1917E4FCE196@dscpl.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <E93AF6C6-0493-48EB-AE83-1917E4FCE196@dscpl.com.au>
OpenPGP: id=C0F2C580
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigC4CE8EE68952CFFCF8281AF1"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC4CE8EE68952CFFCF8281AF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>=20
> On 13/09/2006, at 8:45 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>=20
>> Woot Woot Woot! We have our wiki!
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/mod_python/
>>
>> Now comes the hard part... what the heck are we going to do with it? :=
)
>=20
> Ahhh, more work. :-(
>=20
> Obviously the FAQ stuff can go over there, but I would really like to
> see the
> main LaTeX documentation converted and hosted there so it can be update=
d
> more easily. Might have to ask Grisha's opinion on that, he might want
> to see
> something be able to still be downloadable with the source code itself.=
 In
> practice though, how many actually use the LaTeX source to generate the=
ir
> own documentation, I would guess most go to the web site anyway. We wou=
ld
> have to be careful though to make sure we annotate features to show ove=
r
> time at which version they were introduced, since we will not have para=
llel
> snapshots of documentation for each major release.

Regarding hosting the official documentation within a wiki...

A topic that has recently come up on infra@ is that anything that is
editable by people without ASF CLAs on file is ineligible to be shipped
as part of an official Apache release.

Just thought I ought to call attention to that point, if wiki-fication
of the main docs is being considered.

Other projects have approached this by having two separate wikis, the
documentation one being write-access-restricted to CLA-ed people.

Max.


--------------enigC4CE8EE68952CFFCF8281AF1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFFB0NBfFNSmcDyxYARAp8aAJoCLnQNaYNCFFv6BJJKj+6jZRdTbQCcCd7J
vxXvgODrJyVt/JgMIyPjlLg=
=6DvA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigC4CE8EE68952CFFCF8281AF1--