Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BE4200CC4 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:53:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6667016C2C6; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AAFD716C2C5 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:53:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 85251 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2017 14:53:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 85240 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2017 14:53:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 31EE6C002B for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.003 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ckiVhKpGnsC for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 00DE05FC5D for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C24D2C04B929 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com C24D2C04B929 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gsim@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com C24D2C04B929 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-34.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFFF4F6B4 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Dispatch Router throughput To: users@qpid.apache.org References: From: Gordon Sim Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd, Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903, Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander Message-ID: <3405de6b-ed04-f884-5438-edb8ada02f50@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:53:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:35 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:53:41 -0000 On 13/07/17 15:20, Hudalla Kai (INST/ECS4) wrote: > Let's say we have a single sender, sending pre-settled messages with a payload of 20 bytes and a single receiver for the messages. > > If all is correctly setup, what number of messages could we expect going through Dispatch Router? I am merely interested in an order of magnitude. Are we talkinng about 1.000s, 10.000s or 100.000s per second? It depends on the client used. I haven't actually measured performance with pre-settled messages (not sure if anyone else can comment on that case specifically) but for unsettled messages, a single sender and receiver using qpid::messaging c++, I would expect 80-90k msgs/sec. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org