Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6532200C14 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 20:55:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E501D160B3E; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C65C160B32 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 20:55:12 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 38128 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2017 19:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 38117 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2017 19:55:11 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:55:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BC76AC0C5C for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:55:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -8.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXR9w0qOwgfz for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 263755F1BA for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29A0624C0 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-116-222.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-116-222.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.222]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v17JsWux000684 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:54:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1486497265.22846.2.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qpid Proton] How mandatory is Cyrus for SASL From: Alan Conway To: users@qpid.apache.org Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:54:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1486070294.5438.15.camel@redhat.com> References: ,<1486065081.13467.25.camel@redhat.com> <1486070294.5438.15.camel@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:54:33 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:55:13 -0000 On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 16:18 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 19:54 +0000, Adel Boutros wrote: > > In our case, we only use EXTERNAL or ANONYMOUS so it should be > > enough. > > > > > > Is there a reason it is called "null"? > > It's actually the "none" implementation! As in, no other sasl library > found. > > You can make sure it is used by adding "-DSASL_IMPL=none" to the > cmake > command line. Or use ccmake to set SASL_IMPL interactively. > None or null may be too harsh - it is a valid SASL implementation but one that only supports EXTERNAL/ANONYMOUS, which means it doesn't do very much. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org