qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Patch + jira vs pull request
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:28:12 GMT
Slight retraction...JIRA mails will be getting blocked again right
now, JIRA will need restarted to adjust the mails going forward.

Robbie

On 31 January 2017 at 16:21, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
> There was an issue with the github setup, with the 'qpid-java' mirror
> repo combined with 'qpid' svn sub-repo complicating matters, but that
> should be fixed now.
>
> The dev@ list was blockingthe JIRA traffic due to the format of the
> JIRA mails changing during the upgrade, those mails should now also be
> getting through.
>
> Robbie
>
> On 31 January 2017 at 12:26, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is now enabled, see
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7650 and
>> https://github.com/apache/qpid-java/pull/5 as example.
>>
>> Note that the mails to the dev@ list were still not seen, as something
>> seems to be wrong with the list, or at least JIRA. No mails from JIRA
>> are arriving, even though I have been receiving the matching/duplicate
>> mails sent directly to me. Raised as
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13432 after chatting to
>> infra, likely related to the very recent JIRA upgrade. I'll give the
>> PR thing another check once its clearer what the issues are.
>>
>> Also, while the process of closing the PR worked fine, it did take a
>> good 20+mins for the commit to make it to the github mirror (via the
>> asf git mirror, via svn) and close it, as opposed to the near instant
>> updates normally seen when using the git repositories.
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 30 January 2017 at 13:19, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Saying that made me look, and it seems like the GitHub integration is
>>> indeed not enabled on the apache/qpid-java mirror. There are a few old
>>> open Pull Requests and one test PR open+closed (nice account Lorenz
>>> :P), none of which have been visible on the list. I raised
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13422 to get the GitHub
>>> mails/JIRA comments integration enabled for the repo.
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On 30 January 2017 at 12:28, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> JIRA+PR or JIRA+patch, either approach is fine and works out largely
>>>> the same for us in the end (almost identical if you really want, since
>>>> you can get a patch by adding .patch to github pr/diff/commit URLs).
>>>>
>>>> Assuming the 'GitHub integration' stuff is enabled (and if it isn't,
>>>> that would be an oversight) on the particular GitHub mirror in
>>>> question, raising a PR generates a mail to the dev@ mailing list, and
>>>> if the JIRA key is in the PR title (e.g "QPID-1234:short description")
>>>> then a comment will also be placed on the JIRA for the open/close and
>>>> any PR comments. The JIRA key should also be included in the commit so
>>>> that once merged the JIRA is updated with details of the actual commit
>>>> (see existing commits/JIRAs). We cant click the typical 'merge pr'
>>>> button on GitHub at this time, as the mirrors are read only, but we
>>>> can add the mirrors as remotes for our existing checkouts and
>>>> merge+push PR commits to the source repo which then get mirrored
>>>> similarly. PRs are marked merged automatically if their commit history
>>>> became the unmodified head at the time of merge, but more safely can
>>>> be closed out by a commit (either the specific one with the changes,
>>>> or a merge commit introducing the original, or just an empty commit)
>>>> containing a "This closes #<PR>" message somewhere in their log. The
>>>> PR process for the ASF's GitHub mirrors works essentially the same for
>>>> the svn based repos as it does for the Git based repos (asuming you
>>>> are actually using git-svn, which I believe many/most folks are?).
>>>>
>>>> Robbie
>>>>
>>>> On 30 January 2017 at 11:51, Lorenz Quack <quack.lorenz@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> I think it is different for different components of Qpid.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Qpid broker for Java for example has not migrated its main repository
to
>>>>> git.
>>>>> Also the GitHub mirror is treated as read-only. And it is quite possible
>>>>> that pull request might go unnoticed.
>>>>> So, for the Qpid broker for Java component I would recommend for the
time
>>>>> being to use JIRA/patches/email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Lorenz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 30/01/17 10:56, Chris Richardson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been wondering about this too and would definitely give a
+1 to the
>>>>>> pull request approach if it's an option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /C
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 28 January 2017 at 08:51, Adel Boutros <adelboutros@live.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For some time we have been submitting jira issues with patches
for
>>>>>>> problems we have detected. However, it is also possible to perform
a pull
>>>>>>> request on the github repositories.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I was wondering which method you prefer and why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Adel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>>>>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message