qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paolo Patierno <ppatie...@live.com>
Subject RE: Qpid dispatch router issue
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:52:07 GMT
Hi,

the role for the connector should be "route-container" not "on-demand".

Regards,
Paolo.

Paolo PatiernoSenior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat
Microsoft MVP on Windows Embedded & IoTMicrosoft Azure Advisor 
Twitter : @ppatierno
Linkedin : paolopatierno
Blog : DevExperience

> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 05:45:30 -0700
> From: ericclappier@eaton.com
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Qpid dispatch router issue
> 
> Thank Ted.
> I set "standalone" mode for the router configuration.
> But now the dispatch router seems have problem when it try to connect to the
> broker.
> Indefinitely, there is a timeout error after connection: "local-idle-timeout
> expired".
> Here is the dispatch router log:
> ...
> 
> ...
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-dispatch-router-issue-tp7648428p7648633.html
> Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> 
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message