Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7172009F9 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:51:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AA2411609A8; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id EEFCA1602C5 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 64651 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2016 13:51:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 64640 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2016 13:51:37 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5FF02C0713 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.279 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.279 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAY6ElpriBSg for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com (dub004-omc4s26.hotmail.com [157.55.2.101]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F0CC95F244 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB112-W134 ([157.55.2.71]) by DUB004-OMC4S26.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 23 May 2016 06:51:28 -0700 X-TMN: [H4QWIkHMYEZ9/JAzCxxUJ97zoqNFftDvRrUzM06irfE=] X-Originating-Email: [adelboutros@live.com] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_cf6fa43a-5d8f-48a7-9aa1-2be8504d522b_" From: Adel Boutros To: "users@qpid.apache.org" Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 2013 Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:51:28 +0200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: ,, MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2016 13:51:28.0308 (UTC) FILETIME=[34522F40:01D1B4FA] archived-at: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:39 -0000 --_cf6fa43a-5d8f-48a7-9aa1-2be8504d522b_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes sure=2C we can try to launch them on the trunk. I will let you know whe= n this is done and how it turns out. For the time being=2C we will stick with the already passing tests: 1/25 Te= st #1: qpid-client-test ................. Passed 1.01 sec 2/25 Test = #2: quick_perftest ................... Passed 1.08 sec 3/25 Test #3: = quick_topictest .................. Passed 3.94 sec 4/25 Test #4: quic= k_txtest ..................... Passed 1.01 sec 5/25 Test #5: quick_tx= test2 .................... Passed 0.99 sec 6/25 Test #6: msg_group_te= sts .................. Passed 23.73 sec 7/25 Test #7: run_header_test = .................. Passed 3.20 sec 8/25 Test #8: python_tests .......= ..............***Failed 685.70 sec 9/25 Test #9: interop_tests ..........= ..........***Failed 0.82 sec10/25 Test #10: ha_tests ...................= ...... Passed 1.56 sec11/25 Test #11: qpidd_qmfv2_tests ..............= ..***Failed 1.16 sec12/25 Test #12: interlink_tests ..................**= *Failed 0.87 sec13/25 Test #13: idle_timeout_tests ...............***Fai= led 1.13 sec14/25 Test #14: swig_python_tests ................***Failed = 0.82 sec15/25 Test #15: ipv6_test ........................***Failed 0= .78 sec16/25 Test #16: federation_tests .................***Failed 123.01 = sec17/25 Test #17: federation_sys_tests .............***Failed 2.49 sec1= 8/25 Test #18: queue_flow_limit_tests ........... Passed 1.37 sec19/25= Test #19: acl_tests ........................***Failed 20.30 sec20/25 Tes= t #20: cli_tests ........................***Failed 0.37 sec21/25 Test #2= 1: dynamic_log_level_test ...........***Failed 0.33 sec22/25 Test #22: d= ynamic_log_hires_timestamp ......***Failed 0.31 sec23/25 Test #23: store= _tests ......................***Failed 153.19 sec24/25 Test #24: store_tes= ts_clfs .................***Failed 153.92 sec25/25 Test #25: queue_redirec= t ...................***Failed 0.37 sec PS: The ha_tests have a missing dependency but is marked as passed. Regards=2CAdel > Date: Mon=2C 23 May 2016 05:52:38 -0700 > Subject: Re: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 2013 > From: justin.ross@gmail.com > To: users@qpid.apache.org >=20 > On Mon=2C May 23=2C 2016 at 4:12 AM=2C wrote: >=20 > > 1) A missing powershell script(run_queue_redirect.ps1) forces a test > > (queue_redirect) not to start > > >=20 > Given that it's not really in working shape=2C I would disable this test. > Otherwise=2C you'll need to write the missing script. Even if you do wri= te > the missing script=2C there's no guarantee the test will work as expected= =2C > just because it wasn't ported to windows before and hasn't historically > been under test. >=20 >=20 > > 2) Python scripts can be executed on Linux without adding "python" prio= r > > to the script name because it is detected from the first line in the sc= ript > > (#!/usr/bin/env python). This doesn't work on Windows unless "py" exten= sion > > files are associated with python. To do this=2C all python scripts must= end > > with .py which is not the case for a lot of the scripts such as the qpi= dd > > management tools (qpid-python-test=2C qpid-config=2C ...) > > >=20 > The tests wrt Windows have long been a problem. I started working on > improving them a couple months ago. One of the things I did was add batc= h > files for all the command line tools so that the test scripts could more > easily use them. >=20 > https://github.com/apache/qpid/blob/trunk/qpid/cpp/management/python/bin/= qpid-config.bat >=20 > That work is on trunk right now=2C set for release in Qpid C++ 1.35.0. > That's coming in a month or so. >=20 >=20 > > So we wanted to know if you could help us fix the above issues? > > > > We are currently debugging other issues as well and wanted to ask you t= o > > confirm that some of the tests actually requires the management tools > > installed as a pre-requisite? > > >=20 > That's right. Many of the tests require the management tools. As of > 1.35.0=2C those tools are part of the C++ source tree. >=20 > Care to try running the trunk tests? The changes there will address some > of your problems=2C but there are definitely still known problems. I'd l= ove > to get your help to improve our tests in the next release. >=20 > Justin = --_cf6fa43a-5d8f-48a7-9aa1-2be8504d522b_--