Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACsaS95JMYcbCFqbNxgMQ1fMpYhvKimysrXXTyv50u7fGm824w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1462178721751-7642996.post@n2.nabble.com>
	<572722A1.2010709@redhat.com>
	<1462183426440-7642998.post@n2.nabble.com>
	<57275FBD.8000809@redhat.com>
	<1462259845547-7643131.post@n2.nabble.com>
	<CACsaS95Ee_waEtvjvuj3v=Q0Nf8WoAz=Rg-VVNdbQtDrByAogA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACsaS95JMYcbCFqbNxgMQ1fMpYhvKimysrXXTyv50u7fGm824w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 09:26:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CACsaS97wACY=K0U=P4zNGERqZDjv8mj_FaLBUD=yPAXide=Vyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Filtering issues
From: Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113efde2d1bf9c0531eb0875
archived-at: Tue, 03 May 2016 07:27:03 -0000

--001a113efde2d1bf9c0531eb0875
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

If someone wants to point me at the doc for the C++ broker extensions to
the selector syntax, I'll try to find some time to add support. Obviously
we are still waiting on the official JMS over AMQP spec to define a
complete filter syntax (hint: Robbie).

-- Rob

On 3 May 2016 9:17 a.m., "Vavricka" <vavricka.tomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gordon Sim wrote
> > For the timestamp query, why are you dividing by 1000? The JMSTimestamp
is
> > in milliseconds. Is  'tomorrow' a Date object?
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, I used same code for testing qpid c++
broker.
> Qpid c++ broker expects timestamp in seconds.
>
> When I removed division by 1000, code is working correctly now.
>
>
> Gordon Sim wrote
> > However AMQP 0-10 defines the message-id to be a uuid, JMS
> > defines it to be a string. Is it possible there is some issue in the
> > exact format being compared?
>
> You are also correct in this one. I used to retrieve messageID by 'String
> messageID = msg.getJMSMessageID();' and returned string was in format
> 'ID:UUID', but selector in consumer expects string without 'ID:' prefix.
> When I removed the prefix code start to work as expected.
>
>
> Gordon Sim wrote
> > Ok, so I _believe_ the java broker does not support the AMQP style
> > naming of properties for AMQP 1.0. You can use the JMS names however.
>
> Is planned support for AMQP naming style properties for AMQP 1.0?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help.
>
> Regards,
> Vavricka
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Filtering-issues-tp7642996p7643131.html
> Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>

--001a113efde2d1bf9c0531eb0875--