Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFQGvK+O+e2djGRoV-e1fxpb-Twd_ih46FkouFwmE=QX5Yn44w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAFitrpT0Uiw=6OHBAe372fUhgCpSUke_vWmj9Yp01BN9WYDEQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFQGvK+O+e2djGRoV-e1fxpb-Twd_ih46FkouFwmE=QX5Yn44w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:08:32 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAOhBXQ78Gi8Vk7YO9JUJyu0JEQN4nx5fpny9xT-tFS-Fjz90zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] merge the proton mailing list into the users/dev lists
From: Jakub Scholz <jakub@scholz.cz>
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Cc: "users@qpid.apache.org" <users@qpid.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146762c93e46d052f422aad

--001a1146762c93e46d052f422aad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Kai <sophokles.kh@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:25 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Many moons ago, a seperate mailing list was established for Proton,
> > back when it was purely a protocol engine other components would use.
> > Its scope has since expanded beyond that and the separate mailing list
> > has I feel been an increasing source of confusion and hassle of late
> > more than anything else. Collapsing it into the other larger existing
> > lists we have (that the traffic would otherwise have been on) seems to
> > me like it would be an improvement across the board, and as such I
> > have called this vote.
> >
> > I would propose that discussion (such as this) would head to the
> > users@q.a.o list to join the similar/related/duplicate traffic already
> > present, with remaining things going to the dev@q.a.o list as
> > consistent with that list (e.g JIRA, GitHub integration mails,
> > ReviewBoard, though the latter was never actually directed to proton@
> > to begin with..).
> >
> > Whilst redirecting JIRA etc emails should be easy enough (has been
> > done before), I dont know what the precise options are regarding
> > existing mail subscriptions to the list. There are significantly more
> > subscribers to users@ than proton@, and many are duplicates, but some
> > are not. I'd need to discuss options with infra, but first things
> > first, the vote.
> >
> > I have gone straight to a vote on this because I feel this has already
> > been discussed enough previously over time that many people will have
> > already thought about it enough to quickly vote one way or the other,
> > and it is past time to act on it if things head that way. Obviously
> > things can be further discusssed at this point also if desired.
> >
> > Note that both users@ and proton@ are in the recipients. I expect the
> > thread will splinter when someone forgets to reply-all, as almost all
> > cross-posted thread on the lists do, but at least it can start on both
> > for visibility to all.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
>

--001a1146762c93e46d052f422aad--