qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: [C++/Java Broker] [Transactions]
Date Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:54:10 GMT
On 01/05/2016 11:42 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> On 4 January 2016 at 19:59, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 12/30/2015 06:37 PM, aconway wrote:
>>> I believe dispatch *could* support at least some of the AMQP 1.0 TX and
>>> DTX modes even with message routing, we just haven't gotten there yet.
>>
>>
>> For local transactions, any transfer or disposition related to the
>> transaction needs to be routed to the same process, over the same
>> connection[1], as that to which the transaction controller link is routed.
>>
>> [1] If the multi-ssns-per-txn capability is not supported by the process in
>> question, the same session would have to be used. If the multi-txns-per-ssn
>> capability was not supported then you would need a unique session for every
>> distinct transaction.
>>
>
> To clarify that last bit, I asume you mean every currently active transaction?

Yes, once the transaction is completed the session would be free to be 
associated with another one.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message