Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <567834B5.5050807@redhat.com>
References: 
 <CAHh5=gsBo+CRU0hdVjpMsy4-cX3uS_GMZhiwmNtncY7_Nc0f6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<567834B5.5050807@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:43:21 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAHh5=gus_VNbALnCVQpTvZDYQnX9s5-eqEdMcbvetFWYPapuyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [C++ Broker][JMSSelector][AMQP 1.0] problem with JMSCorrelationID
 while using JMS Selector
From: Olivier Mallassi <olivier.mallassi@gmail.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140254624f5bf05276e8a96

--001a1140254624f5bf05276e8a96
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Looks like my understanding of addressing in AMQP 1.0 is not that
good...and that I am still struggling to forget the AMQP 0.10 concepts. But
your comment helped me.

In fact my address was specifying a queue. so the behavior is as expected.

Are the filters executed  on the broker?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/21/2015 05:02 PM, Olivier Mallassi wrote:
>
>> Based on this discussion, the JMSCorrelation ID  should be ok in the next
>> release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6714
>>
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> Why do messages stay in the queue server side? related to
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5030?
>>
>
> What address are you consuming from when you specify the filter? In qpidd
> terms, if you specify the filter when the node is an exchange (or topic)
> then the selector  should be applied to select which messages get enqueued.
> If the node is a queue however then the selector only controls the messages
> actually consumed from the queue.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>

--001a1140254624f5bf05276e8a96--