qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olivier Mallassi <olivier.malla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [C++ Broker][JMSSelector][AMQP 1.0] problem with JMSCorrelationID while using JMS Selector
Date Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:43:53 GMT
it looks like this is exactly what I was looking for! I will try it (after

Looking at the qpid.filter definition, it looks like I can use a rich
grammar (AND, OR, LIKE?). Is this define somewhere?

Regarding the --argument, I was looking at the python source (
but cannot find anything.

anyway. Thank you very much.


On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/22/2015 06:13 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> (You could use a headers exchange instead of the topic exchange and do
>> some of the selection logic there, but the only reason to do so I think
>> would be if it were more efficient than the selector. I don't know
>> whether it would be as it hasn't been optimised much. The topic exchange
>> is the most efficient means of selection, so if the subject is
>> sufficient as a first level, that might work well).
> And if you didn't want to do any selection at the exchange, and just rely
> on the selector, you could bind the queue to a 'fanout' exchange.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message