qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Giusti <kgiu...@redhat.com>
Subject [RESULT] [VOTE] Use semantic versioning for the qpid-cpp components
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 13:43:14 GMT
Folks,

There were 9 +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed.

I have opened up two tasks in JIRA to track both the migration of qpid-cpp to its own source
tree and the move to semantic versioning:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6856
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6857



----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: "Ken Giusti" <kgiusti@redhat.com>
> To: "Qpid Dev" <dev@qpid.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 10:23:44 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Use semantic versioning for the qpid-cpp components
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'm calling a formal vote on the recent discussion about qpid-cpp versioning:
> 
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Can-the-next-release-of-the-C-broker-and-tools-be-1-0-0-td7633329.html
> 
>  [ ] Yes - Adopt semantic versioning for qpid-cpp after its components have
>  been moved to their own source tree. The first release using semantic
>  versioning will have the initial version number of 1.(N+1).0, where N comes
>  from the last stable release of qpid-cpp using the 0.N version format.
> 
>  [ ] No - continue with the current 0.N version format.
> 
> --
> -K
> 

-- 
-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message