Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55E0C050.6040801@redhat.com>
References: 
 <CAL1zMnMvVi7V20Hj6wMDnvp_zJ+Xb-tieONNDVFZm_KOJkPg5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<55E0C050.6040801@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:30:50 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAL1zMnMFphwip5ev7dNW8fGcNOArg5fSwFzeaxkRvKZ+BzC5xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dispatch Router - why this config doesn't work?
From: jjw tectec <jjw.tectec@gmail.com>
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141a8dcaab36f051e64f53f

--089e0141a8dcaab36f051e64f53f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Ted,

My 2nd broker is running on a different port 5670 (command: ./qpidd -p 5670
--data-dir /home/mmos/datadir/).
So the scenario I'm trying to test is the following:

Client_publisher -> BrokerA (port 5672) -> Router -> BrokerB (port 5670) ->
Client_subscriber

This is my first step in testing Dispatch Router. Once this is successful,
my BrokerB will be replaced by something else.

Can you please provide a config file that would make this scenario work?

Thank you!

jjw

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Ted Ross <tross@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for giving Dispatch Router a try.  I'm a little unclear as to
> exactly what it is you are trying to do.
>
> It looks to me that you have both BrokerA and the Router listening on port
> 5672.  This is not going to work as whichever process you start first will
> get the port and the other will fail to open its listener.
>
> However, simply fixing this problem isn't going to make this work.  Can
> you provide some more detail as to what you want to see?  Are there
> specific queues or topics on the brokers that you are using?  What is the
> desired path for messages to flow along?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Ted
>
>
>
> On 08/28/2015 03:00 PM, jjw tectec wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to run a quick test using Dispatch Router, and I think I need
>> help with configuration.
>>
>> I'd like to set up such a router between two AMQP brokers, and routes
>> messages from BrokerA to BrokerB.
>>
>> Right now, I have Qpid BrokerA running on port 5672, and Qpid BrokerB
>> running on port 5670, and I have a router running the following
>> "qdrouterd.conf" config file content:
>>
>> listener {
>>      addr: localhost
>>      port: 5672
>>      sasl-mechanisms: ANONYMOUS
>> }
>>
>> connector {
>>      addr: localhost
>>      port: 5670
>>      sasl-mechanisms: ANONYMOUS
>> }
>>
>> router {
>>      mode: standalone
>> }
>>
>> Why doesn't the above config work with this simple scenario?
>> I tested this broker+router setup using two clients: subscriber
>> subscribing
>> to port 5670, and publisher publishing to port 5672. Messages don't flow
>> through...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> jjw
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>

--089e0141a8dcaab36f051e64f53f--