qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid JMS client 0.5.0
Date Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:58:37 GMT
On 28 August 2015 at 14:40, Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 11:35 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have put together a first spin for a 0.5.0 Qpid JMS client release,
>> please test it and vote accordingly.
>>
>> The source and binary archives can be grabbed from here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.5.0-rc1/
>>
>> Those files and the other maven artifacts are also staged for now at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1044
>
>
> mvn clean install gave me one test failure:
>
>> Results :
>>
>> Failed tests:
>>
>> JmsExpiredMessageConsumptionTest.testConsumerReceivePrefetchZeroMessageExpiredInFlight:254
>> expected:<[expire]d message> but was:<[vali]d message>
>>
>> Tests run: 403, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 5
>>
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>> [INFO]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS ........................................... SUCCESS
>> [14.132s]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS Client .................................... SUCCESS
>> [1:04.875s]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS Discovery Library ......................... SUCCESS
>> [12.862s]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS Broker Interop Tests ...................... SUCCESS
>> [0.059s]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS ActiveMQ Interop Tests .................... FAILURE
>> [8:22.792s]
>> [INFO] QpidJMS Examples .................................. SKIPPED
>> [INFO] QpidJMS Docs ...................................... SKIPPED
>> [INFO] Apache Qpid JMS ................................... SKIPPED
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 9:56.805s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Aug 28 14:27:44 BST 2015
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 24M/128M
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Looking at it this it appears to be a problem with the test itelf,
where it could be susceptible to slowdown of the broker interactions
when run on slowers machines. I actually already mentioned to Tim
earlier in the week that I might convert those particular set of tests
so they dont use a broker, this would be another reason to.

>From the time taken listed it looks like the machine you are using is
possibly very slow. I havent seen this test fail personally or on the
various slow CI systems they are running on, so I don't think I would
class it as a blocker.

Robbie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message