Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5942618547 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97346 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2015 09:31:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 97324 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2015 09:31:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 97312 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2015 09:31:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:31:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EBDE6CD6C7 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:31:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6MVkjj95YRK1 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com [209.85.213.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 66EFF429A8 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so8993184igb.0 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:31:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Ohdm5JV+Rw0UNp9wAtIPfRj060BWgYoobBFQAMi+Q5E=; b=b59wFaY3lk6+UwcsfMaTv5791324RXBiq5nniZq1W1EMrBJlSRo2vfYMx2iM9oPRJY Kv91A2wSnrsRQ9/1QjnIzLqXN0o3KzLaQIBvnZjGi5lyAfF1TOzLuRqR45wCojGW7z4r qfPOEqq83tpHJ6mNHmTt7aRRHfrw8Ulo07zPNsd8/J1/o0pGDfkWa9dM2xhUENiorWHu BtNkl3HIImLFFkwBVDLnm4WFD34M/efiQTCRiQGCACwUmsCJBnPbXQtYpfGyi5flLGRD i/0O8mPIxiX28jxmZCPlPbpSbvnJXMwoLVUDSNjuOF5dG+emc97/Kiw6YBxaxL1QoKvR oY1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.161 with SMTP id q1mr3093909igr.12.1434101477931; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.111.132 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:31:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5579DA6A.7010403@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:31:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: qpid-cpp release? From: Robbie Gemmell To: "users@qpid.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Some other things that have come to mind: - What is the version going to be, 33.0 ? - JIRAs will likely need updated to appropriately segregate the 'Qpid CPP' changes to their own version. - The website will need a fair bit of surgery. The scripting used for the site to generate the release pages, and the component pages, doc+download pages, adding the menus etc mostly assumes everything is being released currently. There is probably some 'fun' lurking in there with all the JIRA links too (use of fix versions and components). Robbie On 11 June 2015 at 20:08, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > No concerns from me, as mentioned elsewhere I was planning to ask the > same (after getting my other vote finished :P) due to noticing earlier > that Matt asked about the next release on IRC yesterday. Upon > checking, it is ~4 months since the last branch, so things should have > been getting underway by now. > > My only question is whether we want to proceed with the relayout [1] > work now, giving e.g. a qpid-cpp release containing the broker and > tools, or instead leave that until after the release. I can see that > it might be safest to get a release out now and then go about > reorganising things (though we said the same thing last time around > :D). The Java components have already been moved, so we should get > round to doing the others. > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Source+tree+layout+proposal > > On 11 June 2015 at 19:58, Gordon Sim wrote: >> There have been numerous fixes in qpid-cpp since the last release and it >> would be nice to get a new release out. Anyone have any concerns about that >> or anything pending they would like to land before we start the process? >> >> I'm thinking we can just release qpid-cpp on its own, unless there are fixes >> in other components (qpid-python, qpid-tools) that people want to see >> released? (I know qpid-java is planning its own release cycle now it has >> moved) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org