qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Giusti <kgiu...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Python 3 port is 'done'
Date Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:21:23 GMT

No, really - this time I'm serious.

I've resynced with master, fixed up a few minor issues, and pushed to the kgiusti-python3


Thanks go to Flavio for all the help with getting this done and tested.

I'm planning on merging this into master after the weekend unless I hear of any show stoppers.



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Giusti" <kgiusti@redhat.com>
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org, users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:05:32 PM
> Subject: Python 3 port is 'done'
> Well, done enough to consider merging to master.
> While the patch is quite large, most of the changes are simple syntax changes
> to avoid non-python3 compliant syntax.
> The code is available on the kgiusti-python3 branch at the Apache repo.
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kgiusti-python3
> I've also made a patch that can be viewed up on reviewboard:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33691/
> I've verified that the unit tests and python examples run under python2.6,
> 2.7, and python3.3.   I'd appreciate if folks would take this patch for a
> spin and report back their experience.
> Known Issues:
> These changes will be incompatible with earlier versions of the python 2.x
> series.  I know for a fact that python versions <= 2.4 won't even parse this
> patch, and I suspect getting such older versions of python to work would
> require lots of effort.   I'm a little unsure of how well python 2.5 will be
> supported - I have yet to test that far back.  I also didn't test anything
> earlier than 3.3 in the python3.x stream.
> --
> -K

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message