Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gsim@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <550C2021.5060702@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:26:57 +0000
From: Gordon Sim <gsim@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd, Registered in England and Wales under Company
 Registration No. 3798903, Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Matt Parsons
 (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Michael O'Neill (Ireland)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Website changes for the JMS client
References: 
 <CAFitrpRhaLddr4hUXgTJ+Sfva8a1a8RcByzaymMG7n_v8nG-xQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFitrpRhaLddr4hUXgTJ+Sfva8a1a8RcByzaymMG7n_v8nG-xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 03/19/2015 05:55 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/jms/0.1.0/website/
>
> What do people think of the changes?

Looks good to me!

> My main questions were around
> whether we should give a more prominent link on the download page for
> the old client for a bit longer during transition, and whether the 0-x
> client is exposed enough on the component pages to avoid too much
> confusion?

I think its about right as you have it. It's still fairly easy to find 
the older/other clients, since the pages are not too cluttered, but the 
focus is on the new one which is what I think we want.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org