qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Qpid C++ and Python 15.02 - Alpha approaches
Date Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:49:06 GMT
On 01/20/2015 03:37 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Any-ETA-on-a-QPid-0-32-release-td7617054.html
> Yes, the generally agreed goal is to move away from "0." for our now mature
> components.  I don't think any suggestion was made about Proton.
> Most participants on that thread favored a YY.MM (Year, Month) scheme, so
> that's where I started.

The main advantage I see from the year/month scheme is the ability to 
relate different component versions to each other. E.g. 15.06 of 
component X was released at the same time 15.06 of component y was, but 
after 15.01 of component z and before 15.12 of component, um, a, lets say.

I.e. you really only get benefit out if this if it is used fairly 
broadly across components that are released at different times.

While I see some advantage from this scheme, there are different 
advantages for other schemes so I have no desire to impose this it. 
However if there isn't sufficient agreement to use it more widely than 
just the qpid-cpp and related bits, I'm not sure it has much advantage 
(and it is definitely a bit unusual).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message