Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7019F10828 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 17:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99468 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2014 17:53:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 99433 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2014 17:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 99422 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2014 17:53:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:53:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gsim@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.28] (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:53:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB2Hqo3i003902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:52:51 -0500 Received: from [10.36.116.109] (ovpn-116-109.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.109]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB2Hqnsw015817 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 12:52:50 -0500 Message-ID: <547DFCAD.6080407@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 17:53:49 +0000 From: Gordon Sim Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd, Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903, Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Matt Parsons (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Michael O'Neill (Ireland) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Any ETA on a QPid 0.32 release References: <547CE797.9060108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/02/2014 04:14 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > Can we also move from version 0.32 to something more reflective of the > maturity of the product? 3.2? [...] > I'd also be in favour of separating > out the components a bit - from the Java side we'd probably then look to > branch later but spend less time on a branch before release. I have no issue with releasing components on different schedules. However I do think it is very important that every component has an established release schedule published well in advance. The 'main' qpid release has at least given a fairly predictable periodicity to releases, though we could certainly do better at publishing roadmaps in advance. The proton 0.9 roadmap is very welcome. However I think previously, proton and dispatch releases are hard to predict or understand for the general public and we want to make that sort of uncertainty less common. Obviously dates can slip a little here or there and that's normal. The key is just to give some window into the future plans for every component to all who might be interested. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org