qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Any ETA on a QPid 0.32 release
Date Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:00:32 GMT
On 12/02/2014 09:59 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
>> I feel like for qpidd and qpid::messaging at least, a '1.0' at this
>> point is meaningless and even perhaps confusing. They are both well past
>> that really, placing a high priority on stability and backward
>> compatibility. The 1.0 label to me is more appropriate for newer
>> components like proton, dispatch-router and the new JMS client.
> There's a certain appeal to having the version number be the year.month
> that the product was branched especially if we have four or five
> closely related products. If some whizzy feature of the broker
> is released in 15.4 then you know that it probably isn't supported in
> dispatch 15.2. There's no way to know that if the broker is 3.2 and
> dispatch is 1.1.

Yes, I can see the value in being able to easily determine ordering 
between release numbers of components on different schedules. Also, it 
may help force a more public schedule, by setting the target date in 
order to determine the next release number.

> My preferences in order are:
> 1. All products with 'year'.'month'.
> 2. All products switch to 3.1 on next release and increment independently.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org

View raw message