qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Helen Kwong <helenkw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Possible for unconsumed messages to prevent GC from reclaiming memory held by prior messages?
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:32:32 GMT
Hi Rob, just got your fix in trunk and ran our test again, and confirmed
that the bug is fixed. Thank you again for your help and responding so
quickly!

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for those kind words.
>
> It's always gratifying to be able know that our collective efforts in Qpid
> are being used as widely as possible. The users of Qpid form a vital part
> of our extended community.
>
> I would be remiss, however, if I didn't mention that the efforts of both
> Dan and Helen in creating a clear reproducible test cases, and providing
> detailed analysis of the symptoms (both in this case and in previous
> investigations) makes the job of diagnosing and solving issues a *much*
> easier task.  I'd certainly like to thank them for all their work which has
> helped make Qpid a better experience for everyone.
>
> Finally we'd always like to hear the opinion of our users on features and
> changes they'd like to see in Qpid in future releases... so all feedback
> and suggestions you can give would be most welcome.
>
> Thanks again,
> Rob
>
> On 30 October 2014 12:51, John Buisson <jbuisson@salesforce.com> wrote:
>
> > Wanted to give a huge thank you to the community!  We use QPID outside of
> > what I'd consider the "normal" use cases and we've had nothing but
> amazing
> > responses and help once we can reproduce problems we have.  Community
> > involvement was one of the many reasons we went with QPID and it has
> been a
> > great experience!  Bugs happen, and the exteremely fast response time on
> an
> > open-source project is *much* appreciated!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well... we'll see if there is anything else going on, but that's
> > definitely
> > > a bug which would cause a memory leak.
> > >
> > > I've checked in a change onto trunk for that issue (for 0.16 the code
> > will
> > > be in a slightly different place ... I'll dig that out tmr (actually
> > later
> > > today for me, 1am here now) after I've had some sleep :-).
> > >
> > > Apologies that you've run into this bug,
> > >
> > > -- Rob
> > >
> > > On 30 October 2014 01:01, xiaodan.wang <xiaodan.wang@salesforce.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well I'm speechless, literally an hour after our post, you provide
> the
> > > fix
> > > > :)
> > > > Thank you so much! We will test this out with the fix.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers! Dan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Possible-for-unconsumed-messages-to-prevent-GC-from-reclaiming-memory-held-by-prior-messages-tp7615368p7615937.html
> > > > Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message