qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Ross <jr...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Request For Inclusion in 0.30
Date Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:29:45 GMT
Thanks, approved.


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Keith W <keith.wall@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Justin
>
> One request for inclusion into 0.30 from me:
>
> QPID-6066 r1622176 [0-8..0-9-1] Client AMQSession#getQueueDepth() call
> fails against pre 0.30 java brokers
>
> This change addresses an interoperability issue affecting the non JMS API
> call AMQSession#getQueueDepth when using 0-8 to 0-9-1.  It gives the user
> the option to revert to old behaviour to avoid a defect present in earlier
> Java Brokers.  Reviewed by both Rob and Oleksandr.
>
> Kind regards, Keith.
>
>
>
> On 2 September 2014 16:53, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, approved.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godfrey@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > OK - hopefully this will be the last one from me :-)
> > >
> > > QPID-6052 : [Java Client] The client does not correctly set the
> > > JMSDestination on a 0-9-1 message in ADDR mode
> > >
> > > Commits:
> > >
> > > https://svn.apache.org/r1621143
> > > https://svn.apache.org/r1621148
> > > https://svn.apache.org/r1621149
> > > https://svn.apache.org/r1621150
> > > https://svn.apache.org/r1621826
> > >
> > > An issue in the ADDR address support for AMQP 0-9-1 that was added in
> to
> > > 0.30 - the JMSDestination of an incoming message was not correctly set.
> > >  This was discovered by a user doing testing:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-users/201408.mbox/%3C1409099599208-7612615.post@n2.nabble.com%3E
> > >
> > > They have subsequently confirmed that this changes fixes the issue:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-users/201408.mbox/%3C1409358417305-7612835.post@n2.nabble.com%3E
> > >
> > > And Robbie has reviewed the code changes and agreed with its inclusion
> > > into 0.30:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6052?focusedCommentId=14117512&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14117512
> > >
> > >
> > > One thing to note is that in reviewing this change we identified an
> issue
> > > in the 0-10 codepath which is still exists (that if you don't enable
> > strict
> > > JMS compliance, the subject is not correctly set in the address).  I
> > don't
> > > believe this is a new issue in 0-10 and was anyway unaffected by this
> > work
> > > for 0-9-1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rob
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message