qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.30 release update - alpha is available
Date Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:05:16 GMT
Interesting. I think the only project I looked at that didn't use .sha1 [+
.sha256 on one occasion] was Hadoop, which had a .mds file containing
output from several different algorithms. I had to google that one, seems
to be an alternate output from gpg :)

Robbie

On 22 August 2014 16:55, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:

> I saw both in my sampling.  I'll use whatever you think is more
> conventional.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Looks good.
> >
> > Any particular reason not to use .sha1 extension as others do?
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 22 August 2014 14:48, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I forgot to add that I renamed the archive for Fraser's tools to
> > > qpid-java-qmf-tools.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/quirk/20140822/
> > > >
> > > > Here's another iteration.  Changes include the following.
> > > >
> > > >  - Removed .revision files
> > > >  - Removed the perftests binary
> > > >  - Added .md5 and .sha checksums
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message