qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.30 release update - alpha is available
Date Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:39:43 GMT
On 20 August 2014 11:04, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 August 2014 22:47, Justin Ross <jross@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Here's a preview of what I've got going.  This example run is against
> > trunk, but the same structure would be reflected into 0.30.  Note that
> the
> > dispatch and proton artifacts get removed before doing the "Qpid"
> release.
> >
> >   http://people.apache.org/~jross/quirk/20140819/
> >   http://people.apache.org/~jross/quirk/20140819/java-binaries/
> >
> > I added qpid-qmf2, Fraser's stuff; I'm thinking about renaming the
> archive
> > to qpid-java-qmf-tools.
>
>
> Yeah, its a bit annoying to name, and not aided by the existing artifact
> names.
>
>
> > Correspondingly, the python tools archive is back
> > to being just python code
> >
> > The java binaries are now precisely the same as "mvn package" generates.
> >
>
> Great
>
>
> >  These include websocket and perftests binaries that no one has yet
> > expressed a desire for.
> >
>
> If we distribute the client websocket plugin, we should update the broker
> to depend on it so its binary includes the matching broker plugin. I'll do
> that now.
>

Great - thanks Robbie - not sure why I didn't add that to the broker in the
first place


>
> I'd be fine without the perftests binary being included. We have never
> distributed it in the past, and the maven build is currently set not to
> deploy any of the output for that module as a result, which we should
> perhaps change if we want to begin distributing it on the site. It is only
> being built because the old Ant build system had an optional way to do so,
> and in the end I tied it to the package phase for consistency with the
> other modules. I did consider leaving it requiring a more typical explicit
> "mvn assembly:single" invocation to create that archive, saving the
> precious ~0.x seconds and additional storage during the build process ;)
>


Yeah - I'm not sure there's a whole lot of value in distributing the
perftests module.  If people think there is value in distributing it, I'm
fine with that too though.

-- Rob

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message