From users-return-10805-apmail-qpid-users-archive=qpid.apache.org@qpid.apache.org Sat Jul 26 06:47:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D57F81193E for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77430 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2014 06:47:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-qpid-users-archive@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 77410 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2014 06:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@qpid.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@qpid.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@qpid.apache.org Received: (qmail 77399 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2014 06:47:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:47:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pmoravec@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.132.183.24] (HELO mx3-phx2.redhat.com) (209.132.183.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:47:22 +0000 Received: from zmail20.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail20.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.23]) by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s6Q6l0AJ006765 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 02:47:00 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 02:46:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Pavel Moravec To: users@qpid.apache.org Message-ID: <632527536.18462104.1406357219416.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1406302866.2375.12.camel@localhost> References: <33A2BDFE-4950-4B27-A4B8-72F465129546@icloud.com> <80F7F74D-E004-48DA-9A18-E3F7BFEC25E8@icloud.com> <1406206776.2843.7.camel@localhost> <53D134DA.6030101@blueyonder.co.uk> <1406298612.2375.9.camel@localhost> <1406299616.2798.8.camel@pansy.local> <1406302866.2375.12.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: REQEST FEEDBACK Re: How to test the performance quid c++ broker MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.82.6] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.6_GA_5922 (ZimbraWebClient - FF30 (Linux)/8.0.6_GA_5922) Thread-Topic: REQEST FEEDBACK Re: How to test the performance quid c++ broker Thread-Index: R8YRiTmLO8WqkbYfZ5QJaxo3zkYvsA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ----- Original Message ----- > > >I think that RelWithDebInfo is more generally useful - it gives you > > >nearly all the optimisation you want and debugging symbols for when you > > >screw up! > > > > > Works for me. Did some quick benchmarks and the perf differences between > Release and RelWithDebInfo are not big. One test was 2% off on > throughput, 10% off on latency, but other tests didn't show any > significant difference. > > I'll change it on Tues if nobody else objects. I would vote for whatever of these options to be the default, but with mentioning what the default is and describe its options. I.e. update qpid/cpp/INSTALL, part "Note that there are 4 different predefined cmake build types" (maybe worth mentioning it at the beginning of Paragraph 2) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org