qpid-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chuck Rolke <cro...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: [C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
Date Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:04:49 GMT
An example of a deleted statistic that was restored is in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5355
The accepted restoration described the statistic as Deprecated:

{noformat}
+    <statistic name="framesOutstanding" type="count32" desc="Deprecated"/>
+
{noformat}

-Chuck

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Ross" <jross@apache.org>
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 9:10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
> 
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > getting some queue statistics, I realized there are legacy stats like:
> >
> > byteFtdDepth
> > byteFtdDequeues
> > byteFtdEnqueues
> > msgFtdDepth
> > msgFtdDequeues
> > msgFtdEnqueues
> >
> > that refer to already removed flow-to-disk queue limit policy. As far as I
> > checked, the code changing the stats is a dead code.
> >
> > Is it worth removing the stats counters from management schema (together
> > with the dead code), or does it make sense to keep it there due to some
> > backward compatibility reasons?
> >
> 
> We have to keep them, but they can be set to static values.
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org


Mime
View raw message